Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;mrbrklyn, post: 444982, member: 4381&quot;]I know.&nbsp; That doesn&#039;t surprise me though.&nbsp; He actually thinks at the core that they have a higher accuracy then I think they do.&nbsp; In truth, even in his example where there is a 7/3 split on the judgment of a theoretical coin, so he predicts that a the man team is guaranteed to correctly grade it.&nbsp; BOINK, statistically INCORRECT.&nbsp; Each permutation, 3 for, 3 against, 2 for, 2 against, 1 for, one against, has a specific odds of happening in this case, and by testing the processes, you can determine to likelihood of outcomes.&nbsp; </p><p><br /></p><p>Until these studies are done, and that is the first step of a validation process, he has no clue as to actual results.&nbsp; And I think that 3/7 is generous.&nbsp; But you would know better than me.</p><p><br /></p><p>Ruben[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in