Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
Clear vs. Filled
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="bhp3rd, post: 499397, member: 16510"]<b>Also a rocking motion is needed.</b></p><p><br /></p><p>One thing that has not been mentioned yet is that a rocking type of motion is needed to set the mintmark.</p><p>I think in Margolis and Wexler's books they describe that because the die is slightly convex (I think that's the right word), (rounded) and tapered slightly they must not only strike the mintmark punch they must use a rocking motion as they hit the punch to adequately set the mintmark properly. As I understand it if the punch was struck just flat out the tops and bottoms of the minmark would be rather weak only the center would be seated properly. Remember not only this but they are working in a negative image hitting a small metal rod (die) , slightly cone shaped with a smaller rod (the punch itself) and they did this each week to hundreds if not thousands of dies. It is no wonder their were re-punched, filled, flat, fat, thin, blobs, wide, narrow and everything else in the book as the finished product die with mintmark. Hint, the Wexler files has well over 250 different RPM's for 1960-D Lincoln cents. It's really amazing there were not many more blunders than there were.</p><p>Ben Peters</p><p>"getting old is not all it's cracked up to be"[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="bhp3rd, post: 499397, member: 16510"][b]Also a rocking motion is needed.[/b] One thing that has not been mentioned yet is that a rocking type of motion is needed to set the mintmark. I think in Margolis and Wexler's books they describe that because the die is slightly convex (I think that's the right word), (rounded) and tapered slightly they must not only strike the mintmark punch they must use a rocking motion as they hit the punch to adequately set the mintmark properly. As I understand it if the punch was struck just flat out the tops and bottoms of the minmark would be rather weak only the center would be seated properly. Remember not only this but they are working in a negative image hitting a small metal rod (die) , slightly cone shaped with a smaller rod (the punch itself) and they did this each week to hundreds if not thousands of dies. It is no wonder their were re-punched, filled, flat, fat, thin, blobs, wide, narrow and everything else in the book as the finished product die with mintmark. Hint, the Wexler files has well over 250 different RPM's for 1960-D Lincoln cents. It's really amazing there were not many more blunders than there were. Ben Peters "getting old is not all it's cracked up to be"[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
Clear vs. Filled
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...