Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;bhp3rd, post: 510327, member: 16510&quot;]<b>Dip it - it&#039;s only a Roosevelt, it won&#039;t change the course</b></p><p><br /></p><p>Dip it it&#039;s only a Roosevelt and it would only improve the coin. It certainly won&#039;t change the course of history as we know it.</p><p>I&#039;m going to start calling you guys the <b>anti-cleaners conspiracy league!</b></p><p>I have never seen a group so opposed to what is a common used and accepted practice in my life - leave it like it is????????? I can find no logic at all in that alternative, if fact it is not an alternative it&#039;s an avoidance. Do you folks not wax your cars because it takes a tiny bit of paint off? Of course not, the alternative is worse. I just don&#039;t know how you could say about &quot;that dime&quot; to leave it like it is - it&#039;s not logical, it does not make sense and it is not giving the most constructive opinion to the question.&nbsp;&nbsp; Once we had a 1963 Proof doublED die reverse Roosevelt DDR-001, the big one in an old ANACS holder graded Proof 63 because it had some spots and toning - now you should know that nobody that is a die variety specialist wants a proof 63 in nothing - we dipped it sent it to PCGS, got an proof 67 and change a $225 coin to a $750 coin and that was a big time coin - the coin in question is not - your advice is not logical on this coin - I support your right to have an opinion but on this one it is not the best answer by far.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>Ben (again not afraid and I really don&#039;t clean but 1 out of 100 coins) Peters[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in