Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;GDJMSP, post: 994381, member: 112&quot;]Well, when I answered the comment about keeping things secret I was talking about individuals not keeping things secret - not NCS. Which is what I thought the comment I answered was about.</p><p><br /></p><p>Yeah NCS keeps their methods secret, since that is the business they are in I don&#039;t blame them. I&#039;d keep it secret too if it was my business. It would be stupid not to.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><br /></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>We&#039;ve had this discussion before Thad. Conservation is nothing more than a synonym for cleaning - both words mean exactly the same thing.</p><p><br /></p><p>The two words of differentiation are cleaning and harsh/improper cleaning. I&#039;m sorry, but there is just no getting around that.</p><p><br /></p><p>Would you not say that dipping is cleaning ? Everybody I know would, with the exception of you maybe.</p><p><br /></p><p>Saying that conservation is not cleaning is like saying that cabinet friction or roll friction is not wear. Wear is wear, regardless of how it occurred. A form of wear may be acceptable in determing if a coin is MS or not, but that doesn&#039;t mean it isn&#039;t wear. </p><p><br /></p><p>It&#039;s kind of like saying that a woman isn&#039;t pregnant because she&#039;s only been pregnant for 2 days. There&#039;s no such thing as a little bit pregnant, you either are or you are not.</p><p><br /></p><p>Conservation is cleaning - any way you want to look at it. But it is not harsh/improper cleaning.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in