Claudius and the Praetorians

Discussion in 'Ancient Coins' started by Cicero12, Oct 11, 2020.

  1. IdesOfMarch01

    IdesOfMarch01 Well-Known Member

    Wow! No, I didn't have this information on my coin so I very much appreciate your posting it.

    The coin looks much better in hand and in its color picture than in the catalog picture. Also curious how Triton XI described it as "EF - Lustrous" while the old catalog lists it as "... almost very fine." It's certainly much more the former than the latter.
     
    dlhill132 and DonnaML like this.
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Cicero12

    Cicero12 Well-Known Member

    I definitely agree. This sale was very, very conservative with grading. Even some of the magnificent boscoreale pieces which are now universally graded as Good EF/FDC were graded only "almost EF".
     
  4. AncientJoe

    AncientJoe Well-Known Member

    I managed to track down the original article from 1938 which has your coin photographed. Definitely a valuable additional part of the provenance!

    20201012_135539.jpg
     
    zumbly, TIF, dlhill132 and 4 others like this.
  5. DonnaML

    DonnaML Well-Known Member

    Does anyone know why the Met divested itself of the coin, apparently in 1972? Was it a duplicate?
     
  6. Cicero12

    Cicero12 Well-Known Member

    As I recall, the Met did not really care about the pieces. I believe they were on loan to the ANS and not being displayed. I also recall reading or hearing somewhere there may have been pressure to sell from some donors, I cannot remember where I saw that. I think the Museum as a whole was also in financial trouble.

    It was a very large sale, it brought in something like 2.2 million for just the roman gold.
     
    Last edited: Oct 12, 2020
    DonnaML likes this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page