Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Claudius AE coinage isn’t too shabby either
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="curtislclay, post: 4206670, member: 89514"]Of Jamesicus' four bronzes, only the Drusus sestertius and the Claudius As are from the mint of Rome.</p><p><br /></p><p>Claudius Spes sestertius: Spanish mint, probably Tarraco, because of different legend style (particularly the Ms and Rs), and the dots before and after S C in rev. exergue. A large hoard of sestertii and dupondii all in this style was found near Tarraco in 1872 (Pobla de Mafumet Hoard).</p><p><br /></p><p>Claudius Wreath sestertius: Undetermined Thracian mint, perhaps end of reign in same issue with Britannicus, Agrippina II, and Nero Caesar sestertii, because of somewhat clumsy style and centration dimples on both sides.</p><p><br /></p><p>Laffranchi correctly separated the Tarraco mint and one other Spanish or Gallic mint from Rome in 1948, but unfortunately his discovery was ignored by Sutherland in his revised RIC I (1984) and by Giard in his Paris catalogue (1988), with the result that their only mint distinction for Claudius bronzes, as in the original RIC I and in Cohen, was between "Official (Mint of Rome)" and "Imitations". Von Kaenel in his monograph on Claudius (1986) followed Laffranchi in correctly separating out the Tarraco mint, but improbably regarded it as a branch mint in Rome commissioned by the government to assist in the production of bronze coins.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="curtislclay, post: 4206670, member: 89514"]Of Jamesicus' four bronzes, only the Drusus sestertius and the Claudius As are from the mint of Rome. Claudius Spes sestertius: Spanish mint, probably Tarraco, because of different legend style (particularly the Ms and Rs), and the dots before and after S C in rev. exergue. A large hoard of sestertii and dupondii all in this style was found near Tarraco in 1872 (Pobla de Mafumet Hoard). Claudius Wreath sestertius: Undetermined Thracian mint, perhaps end of reign in same issue with Britannicus, Agrippina II, and Nero Caesar sestertii, because of somewhat clumsy style and centration dimples on both sides. Laffranchi correctly separated the Tarraco mint and one other Spanish or Gallic mint from Rome in 1948, but unfortunately his discovery was ignored by Sutherland in his revised RIC I (1984) and by Giard in his Paris catalogue (1988), with the result that their only mint distinction for Claudius bronzes, as in the original RIC I and in Cohen, was between "Official (Mint of Rome)" and "Imitations". Von Kaenel in his monograph on Claudius (1986) followed Laffranchi in correctly separating out the Tarraco mint, but improbably regarded it as a branch mint in Rome commissioned by the government to assist in the production of bronze coins.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Claudius AE coinage isn’t too shabby either
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...