Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Conder101, post: 558402, member: 66&quot;]Interesting.&nbsp; I think it is overgraded, and if it wasn&#039;t an 1804 dollar it would probably be a bodybag candidate.&nbsp; I&#039;d call it a 50, it looks like it has been cleaned, there are scratches on the bust and what looks like a lamination on the head.&nbsp; For having been struck twice the strike detail is horrible.&nbsp; The reverse is interesting though.&nbsp; It shows evidence that the coin rotated several degrees between the two strikes.&nbsp; (More likely the rev was the hammer die and it rotated between strikes.)&nbsp; This can be most clearly seen at AME.</p><p><br /></p><p>From looking at the pedigrees I see the Dexter specimen has been upgraded again.&nbsp; It was a PF-64, and now it&#039;s a PCGS PF-65.&nbsp; Not bad for a dull mottled gray heavily hairlined lightly circulated proof that has been counterstamped on the reverse.&nbsp; PF-65 huh.&nbsp; I think some of the other class I coins have been upgraded again as well.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in