Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
Clad coins vs 90% silver
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="cladking, post: 1370771, member: 68"]No.</p><p><br /></p><p>There are numerous reasons they hold up so well but in recent years it's primarily the fact that their velocity has slowed remarkably. Back in the 70's a clad quarter was being spent more than three times a month but it's less than half that now. </p><p><br /></p><p>But clad's a little lighter which helps them not wear out since the pressure on them when they colide with other objects is lower. When they're being rubbed together in counting machines there's less weight to tear metal off the surfaces. One of the big reasons they don't wear out is that the 75% copper/ 25% nickel surfaces are much harder and stronger than silver which is soft. </p><p><br /></p><p>Of course there's also the fact that fewer people carry coins in their pants pockets now which combined with physical work used to be a major factor in wearing coins smooth. A workman could wear a pocketfull of coins from Unc to XF+ in a single day of hard work. Now they have machines to dig ditches. </p><p><br /></p><p>In 1957 when I started collecting it wasn't unusual to see 1932 quarters worn nearly smooth. This was only a 25 year old coin. Now 1965 quarters which are nearly twice as old are rarely lower than G+ or G. Dimes are usually lost or destroyed before they even wear down to VG.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="cladking, post: 1370771, member: 68"]No. There are numerous reasons they hold up so well but in recent years it's primarily the fact that their velocity has slowed remarkably. Back in the 70's a clad quarter was being spent more than three times a month but it's less than half that now. But clad's a little lighter which helps them not wear out since the pressure on them when they colide with other objects is lower. When they're being rubbed together in counting machines there's less weight to tear metal off the surfaces. One of the big reasons they don't wear out is that the 75% copper/ 25% nickel surfaces are much harder and stronger than silver which is soft. Of course there's also the fact that fewer people carry coins in their pants pockets now which combined with physical work used to be a major factor in wearing coins smooth. A workman could wear a pocketfull of coins from Unc to XF+ in a single day of hard work. Now they have machines to dig ditches. In 1957 when I started collecting it wasn't unusual to see 1932 quarters worn nearly smooth. This was only a 25 year old coin. Now 1965 quarters which are nearly twice as old are rarely lower than G+ or G. Dimes are usually lost or destroyed before they even wear down to VG.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
Clad coins vs 90% silver
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...