Reply to Thread

Message:: [QUOTE="lrbguy, post: 3111858, member: 88829"]Thank you again, Genio, this really fills in a blank for me!!  I appreciate your willingness to share. Bruun had deferred to LRBC for the sequence of the production series marks, and placed the crescents (without/with a dot) between the dot-series and the star-series. Using Martin's examples: My unofficial mint example:[ATTACH=full]789755[/ATTACH] Bastien however has apparently pulled out the crescent series and replaced it with a wreath series between those two, nonetheless with the disclaimer that the chronology is "doubtful."  So what did he do with the two-part crescent series? Bruun had assigned years to the series entries, but that was based on the assumption of an annual change from 330-335, which came out like this: PLG and <dot>PLG  ...............................330-331<crescent>PLG and <cresent-dot>PLG  ....332<wreath>PLG ........................................333<star>PLG and <frond>PLG ....................333-334PLG (reduced) ........................................335 Apart from dates what does Bastien do with Bruun's relative chronology?Does Bastien hazard any notes on Bruun's supposition re absolute chronology?[/QUOTE]