Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
World Coins
>
Chopmarks vs. Counter-stamp
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="GDJMSP, post: 2436266, member: 112"]Yes. And it's not just technically, it is factually.</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>That's the thing, it's not damage at all because at the moment that an original is counter-marked it ceases to be that original coin and becomes an entirely new and different coin altogether.</p><p><br /></p><p>To fully understand this consider an over-strike. An over-strike is a preexisting coin that is used as a planchet to mint an entirely new coin, which may, or may not, have an entirely different value. And this over-strike is often done, in fact most often done, by the same country or govt. who issued the original coin to begin with. It is typically done for one of two reasons - it saves them money because they don't have to suffer the expense of making the planchets; and/or it allows them to make money by increasing the value of the new coin over and above what the value of the previous coin was. But that's a secondary issue to the one we have at hand.</p><p><br /></p><p>The point here is that when a coin is over-struck the previous coin ceases to exist. It is no longer that old coin. It is the new coin, usually with a new date, and quite often an entirely new design. And often, an entirely new value.</p><p><br /></p><p>And the exact same thing happens when a coin is counter-marked by someone, anyone, with issuing authority. The only difference between a counter-mark and an over-strike are their sizes - meaning the sizes of the dies of each.</p><p><br /></p><p>An over-strike die is the same size as the original coin that has now become a planchet. While a counter-mark die is almost always much smaller than the original coin that has now become a planchet. But in both cases the original coin is struck by dies that change the design and often the value.</p><p><br /></p><p>You also have to understand that it is much cheaper for the issuing authority to use the counter-mark method because it obviously costs less money to produce small, little dies of a random size than it does to produce large dies of a very specific size.</p><p><br /></p><p>So, in every case, when a coin is "officially" counter-marked an entirely new coin is created and the old coin ceases to exist. So a counter-mark can never in any way be considered to be damage.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="GDJMSP, post: 2436266, member: 112"]Yes. And it's not just technically, it is factually. That's the thing, it's not damage at all because at the moment that an original is counter-marked it ceases to be that original coin and becomes an entirely new and different coin altogether. To fully understand this consider an over-strike. An over-strike is a preexisting coin that is used as a planchet to mint an entirely new coin, which may, or may not, have an entirely different value. And this over-strike is often done, in fact most often done, by the same country or govt. who issued the original coin to begin with. It is typically done for one of two reasons - it saves them money because they don't have to suffer the expense of making the planchets; and/or it allows them to make money by increasing the value of the new coin over and above what the value of the previous coin was. But that's a secondary issue to the one we have at hand. The point here is that when a coin is over-struck the previous coin ceases to exist. It is no longer that old coin. It is the new coin, usually with a new date, and quite often an entirely new design. And often, an entirely new value. And the exact same thing happens when a coin is counter-marked by someone, anyone, with issuing authority. The only difference between a counter-mark and an over-strike are their sizes - meaning the sizes of the dies of each. An over-strike die is the same size as the original coin that has now become a planchet. While a counter-mark die is almost always much smaller than the original coin that has now become a planchet. But in both cases the original coin is struck by dies that change the design and often the value. You also have to understand that it is much cheaper for the issuing authority to use the counter-mark method because it obviously costs less money to produce small, little dies of a random size than it does to produce large dies of a very specific size. So, in every case, when a coin is "officially" counter-marked an entirely new coin is created and the old coin ceases to exist. So a counter-mark can never in any way be considered to be damage.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
World Coins
>
Chopmarks vs. Counter-stamp
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...