Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
World Coins
>
Chopmarks: Desired history or a ruined coin??
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="John Anthony, post: 1945190, member: 42773"]A few months ago I came across an anonymous Roman quadrans that had the letters AU punched into it. Doug Smith suggested the coin may have been part of a university collection, and the curator may have counter-stamped the piece to discourage theft. Since then I've learned that that was a common, if deplorable practice.</p><p><br /></p><p>I bought the coin nonetheless, for a song. It was clearly undesirable to anyone else. Would I like to own the coin without the mark? Absolutely, but these cost several hundred dollars apiece in higher grades. So all things considered, I'm quite happy with the acquisition. It's a scarce, higher-grade example with a bit of unfortunate recent history, but it gives me something to post in threads such as this. <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie1" alt=":)" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p><b> Roman Empire, Anonymous, Domitian to Antoninus Pius </b></p><p>AE Quadrans, 3.25g, Rome mint: AD 81-161</p><p>Obv.: Diademed and draped bust of Venus right.</p><p>Rev.: Dove standing right, S-C.</p><p>Reference: RIC II 24 (p. 218)</p><p>Notes: Countermark "AU" in field above dove, possibly from a university collection. </p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]338549[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="John Anthony, post: 1945190, member: 42773"]A few months ago I came across an anonymous Roman quadrans that had the letters AU punched into it. Doug Smith suggested the coin may have been part of a university collection, and the curator may have counter-stamped the piece to discourage theft. Since then I've learned that that was a common, if deplorable practice. I bought the coin nonetheless, for a song. It was clearly undesirable to anyone else. Would I like to own the coin without the mark? Absolutely, but these cost several hundred dollars apiece in higher grades. So all things considered, I'm quite happy with the acquisition. It's a scarce, higher-grade example with a bit of unfortunate recent history, but it gives me something to post in threads such as this. :) [B] Roman Empire, Anonymous, Domitian to Antoninus Pius [/B] AE Quadrans, 3.25g, Rome mint: AD 81-161 Obv.: Diademed and draped bust of Venus right. Rev.: Dove standing right, S-C. Reference: RIC II 24 (p. 218) Notes: Countermark "AU" in field above dove, possibly from a university collection. [ATTACH=full]338549[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
World Coins
>
Chopmarks: Desired history or a ruined coin??
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...