Reply to Thread

Message:: [QUOTE="imrich, post: 1279677, member: 22331"]Legal convolution!! I believe your understanding to be correct in the majority. It is my understanding that this "Mail Fraud" statute initially defines the PERPETRATOR by intent (i.e. acquisition by fraud), chattel (e.g. money/property), means to acquire (pretenses/representations/promises), action (e.g. promise "to dispose"), mechanism (i.e. U.S.P.S. services), and then states maximum Federal Penalties.  M.H.O., hereby soliciting and accepting objective correction. I believe an easily understood appropriate violation would be: One offering to discard ("dispose of"), for an associate, known counterfeit currency, being transferred via U.S.P.S., with intent to publicly distribute. This offense (acquisition of counterfeit material being sold in U.S.), or variation, is currently being zealously prosecuted in numerous U.S. jurisdictions. The legal action avoids the international aspects of jurisdiction and legality  discussed argumentum ad nauseam in this thread. Just my opinion/understanding. :thumb:[/QUOTE]