Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;kanga, post: 411218, member: 9270&quot;]Not surprising.</p><p>Major varieties show up in the pricing guides, so their values are well documented.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>I was looking at <i>Cherrypickers&#039;</i> and found that my 1858 LL FE is actually a 1858/7 (it&#039;s in a TPG for attribution.)</p><p>Later I found out it&#039;s a well know and listed variety.</p><p><i>Cherrypickers&#039;</i> and CDN agree on its approximate value.</p><p>It was in a PCGS holder as AU-58.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>Based on the notes I&#039;m making about my Roosevelt dimes, it appears that <u>in general</u> the &quot;S&quot; mintmark was rarely crisp.</p><p>That&#039;s why I&#039;m having trouble deciding between OMM&#039;s, RPM&#039;s or just poor or worn mintmarks.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>Also found a <u>proof</u> with what appears to be mechanical doubling.</p><p>That was unexpected.</p><p>I thought the Mint was very careful with proof coins.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in