Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Publius2, post: 24867942, member: 105571&quot;]Ay, and there&#039;s the rub.&nbsp; <b><u>If that&#039;s true</u></b>, then collectors with PCGS/NGC beaned coins getting automatic crossovers to CACG are getting hosed because now there are &quot;C&quot; coins that did not merit a bean getting the benefit of the supposition that CACG coins represent the stricter/better judgement that previously distinguished the beaned coins from the C coins.</p><p><br /></p><p><b><u>If that&#039;s true</u></b>, then if a collector is to any extent relying on the better judgement and experience of CACG to protect and/or guide them, then that trust might be misplaced.&nbsp; It&#039;s all very well and good to say &quot;buy the coin not the holder&quot; but not everyone brings a lifetime of coin grading experience not to mention talent to the table.</p><p><br /></p><p>Now I, for one, do not at this point believe that CACG is going to be slabbing any (one hesitates to speak in absolutes) C coins but I would be happy to be corrected with facts.&nbsp; And I don&#039;t think a JA comment from 2008 is necessary applicable to the 2023 CACG policies.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in