Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Pickin and Grinin, post: 24860508, member: 73995&quot;]Some of these things are hard to determine thru a slab and then a video. Just using the first couple, one would have to go to the definitions that CACG uses to determine QC and environmental damage. Both the SMS and Small date had terminal toning. I don&#039;t disagree at all with the grade. Infact I don&#039;t have a problem with the majority of the slabs seen in the video. There has been a need for a market correction for a while now. Call it conservative, well anything you want. Sliders should be called out for what they are a details coin or an AU. The Eagles sure didn&#039;t have that blazing, eye widening luster that a 69 or even a 70 should have so, I am on board with the grades.</p><p><br /></p><p>On the other hand the dealer could have sent out below standard coins knowing that they wouldn&#039;t receive the grades that they had in the first place. (click bait?)</p><p><br /></p><p>Anyways![/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in