Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;EyeEatWheaties, post: 1158722, member: 26972&quot;]Someone set forth an explanation that it was due to the amount of cupric oxidation on the surface of an RB coin likely rendering the coin BN in years to come..&nbsp; Can&#039;t stop the reaction unless the coin is encased in an inert gas???&nbsp; ....... and since the grade guarantee change for copper, that they didn&#039;t want any 67BN coins in population So, the only new 67RB&#039;s in the future, will be from grade guarantees of 67RD that no longer qualify as Red???</p><p><br /></p><p>Kind of makes sense.&nbsp; </p><p><br /></p><p>What&#039;s cool - is in theory, that a 67Red that has turned in the holder could then become a top pop RB coin!</p><p><br /></p><p>Another slick way to encourage regrades and get bad coins out of the holders they should no longer be in???? (keep pops low)?</p><p><br /></p><p>I would imagine that high grade pop 1 in what ever color, are market driven and are more valuable than price guides indicate - ahem... ifeelill on 420&nbsp; <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie1" alt=":)" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p>On the other hand, I doubt that coins that have turned in the holder will have the colors that your 56 does, so therefore not as appealing/desirable=valuable?[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in