Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;KLJ, post: 251952, member: 1910&quot;]The article doesn&#039;t say, although it does say that it&#039;s actually an amendment to a current appropriations bill.&nbsp; Basically the amendment says that no money shall be appropriated to implement 5112(n)(2)(c) USC.&nbsp; Which is what authorizes the rim inscriptions.&nbsp; So the rim inscriptions are still law, the Treasury just can&#039;t spend money to imprint them.&nbsp; </p><p><br /></p><p>The Congressman offering the amendment says that he believes this will default everything - the motto is the important part to him - back to the obverse.&nbsp; My reading is that if the rim inscriptions are still law, but unpaid for, then, if this bill passes (it hasn&#039;t yet passed the Senate) and is signed into law, the presidential dollars will be without date, mintmark, or motto.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in