Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
Chances this is UNC?
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Insider, post: 4658519, member: 24314"]GDJMSP, posted: "Have I ever said - Thank You Mike ! - for all the typing you save me ? Well, if I have, I haven't said it enough !</p><p><br /></p><p>Thank You Mike ! <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie2" alt=";)" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p><i>I'd rather have your first LIKE. Or at the least put the "!" where it belongs!</i> <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie8" alt=":D" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p>Dynoking, posted: "The coin has a nice strike. There Is disagreement over rub or wear on the high spots. I’m on the rub side. This should put the coin in MS territory. My concern is luster. I trying to up my game. How can one tell (from a picture and in hand) if there is luster under the toning?"</p><p><br /></p><p><i>You need to tip and rotate the coin under a bright light. This usually cannot be done in an image. </i></p><p><br /></p><p>whopper64, posted: "...Has anyone noticed with Indian Head cents that many of the NGC/PCGS slabbed coins are way over-graded? <span style="color: rgb(179, 0, 0)">Obvious wear on high points (both obverse and reverse) seem to be ignored</span> as the coins are given an MS grade. I realize that some of the Indian Head cents are not the best strikes, but wear is not a weak strike."</p><p><br /></p><p><i>Brown copper coins are often hard to grade because when they get wear their brown surface turns <b><span style="color: rgb(102, 0, 0)">BROWN</span></b> - just a little darker. Like everything else they do, the TPGS often ignore the rub on attractive Indians. </i></p><p><i><br /></i></p><p><i>This is a fact: ANYONE who cares to examine coins closely under FOLORESCENT LIGHT using a stereomicroscope set at low power 7-10X can EASILY & QUICKLY tell the difference between weak strike, friction wear, and stacking rub - even under toning! Once learned with the scope, a simple 7-10X hand lens is all that is needed 99% of the time to ID each. </i></p><p><i><br /></i></p><p><i>The key is the FLORESCENT LIGHT. Now you know why incandescent light is recommended by 99.999% of professional numismatists. It only lets you see half of the grading equation. I learned to use BOTH on the same coin before reaching an opinion of its grade/authenticity.</i>[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Insider, post: 4658519, member: 24314"]GDJMSP, posted: "Have I ever said - Thank You Mike ! - for all the typing you save me ? Well, if I have, I haven't said it enough ! Thank You Mike ! ;) [I]I'd rather have your first LIKE. Or at the least put the "!" where it belongs![/I] :D Dynoking, posted: "The coin has a nice strike. There Is disagreement over rub or wear on the high spots. I’m on the rub side. This should put the coin in MS territory. My concern is luster. I trying to up my game. How can one tell (from a picture and in hand) if there is luster under the toning?" [I]You need to tip and rotate the coin under a bright light. This usually cannot be done in an image. [/I] whopper64, posted: "...Has anyone noticed with Indian Head cents that many of the NGC/PCGS slabbed coins are way over-graded? [COLOR=rgb(179, 0, 0)]Obvious wear on high points (both obverse and reverse) seem to be ignored[/COLOR] as the coins are given an MS grade. I realize that some of the Indian Head cents are not the best strikes, but wear is not a weak strike." [I]Brown copper coins are often hard to grade because when they get wear their brown surface turns [B][COLOR=rgb(102, 0, 0)]BROWN[/COLOR][/B] - just a little darker. Like everything else they do, the TPGS often ignore the rub on attractive Indians. This is a fact: ANYONE who cares to examine coins closely under FOLORESCENT LIGHT using a stereomicroscope set at low power 7-10X can EASILY & QUICKLY tell the difference between weak strike, friction wear, and stacking rub - even under toning! Once learned with the scope, a simple 7-10X hand lens is all that is needed 99% of the time to ID each. The key is the FLORESCENT LIGHT. Now you know why incandescent light is recommended by 99.999% of professional numismatists. It only lets you see half of the grading equation. I learned to use BOTH on the same coin before reaching an opinion of its grade/authenticity.[/I][/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
Chances this is UNC?
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...