Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
Chances this is UNC?
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="TypeCoin971793, post: 4656079, member: 78244"]Their definition of the AU/MS boundary changed. The rationale is that some technical AU-58’s are Ms-65 coins with just a touch of wear. Some are MS-60 coins with a bit more noticeable wear. And then you have some MS-60/1/2 coins that have significant coin-on-coin damage or post-mint manipulation (dipping, etc). With the way the market is (with values of coins distinctly stratified by grade levels), those superb AU-58s were values the same as or only slightly higher the lower-end 58s, and priced lower than a 60.</p><p><br /></p><p>Why should that be? They are much nicer coins, and they should be worth more. But the vast majority of collectors are afraid to pay higher than the grade’s “value bracket.” That presents a quandary.</p><p><br /></p><p>You could call those coins AU-58+, but you lose the additional flexibility of further describing the quality of the grade. Does it have 63 surfaces, or 67 surfaces? The + can’t divulge that info. (As a side note, AU-58+ coins regularly sell for low-MS prices).</p><p><br /></p><p>Then the thinking shifted: “Is the surface degradation caused by a touch of wear really worse than the surface degradation suffered by MS-60/1/2 coins?” The TPGs decided that the slight touch of wear was commensurate with the bagginess and abrasions on MS-62/3 coins, and as such they get their quality premium over a generic 58.</p><p><br /></p><p>Is this confusing? Most definitely. Can it cause harm to collectors? Absolutely. Are there better solutions? You can bet on it. That’s why I am a proponent of the AU-6X scale. It allows for much greater transparency in the grading decision and gives quality 58s the pricing structure they deserve.</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>Then they need to learn how to spot the AU-64s in MS-62 holders. Or pay up for an MS-64. Blindly trusting the number on the slab isn’t a safe game anymore.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="TypeCoin971793, post: 4656079, member: 78244"]Their definition of the AU/MS boundary changed. The rationale is that some technical AU-58’s are Ms-65 coins with just a touch of wear. Some are MS-60 coins with a bit more noticeable wear. And then you have some MS-60/1/2 coins that have significant coin-on-coin damage or post-mint manipulation (dipping, etc). With the way the market is (with values of coins distinctly stratified by grade levels), those superb AU-58s were values the same as or only slightly higher the lower-end 58s, and priced lower than a 60. Why should that be? They are much nicer coins, and they should be worth more. But the vast majority of collectors are afraid to pay higher than the grade’s “value bracket.” That presents a quandary. You could call those coins AU-58+, but you lose the additional flexibility of further describing the quality of the grade. Does it have 63 surfaces, or 67 surfaces? The + can’t divulge that info. (As a side note, AU-58+ coins regularly sell for low-MS prices). Then the thinking shifted: “Is the surface degradation caused by a touch of wear really worse than the surface degradation suffered by MS-60/1/2 coins?” The TPGs decided that the slight touch of wear was commensurate with the bagginess and abrasions on MS-62/3 coins, and as such they get their quality premium over a generic 58. Is this confusing? Most definitely. Can it cause harm to collectors? Absolutely. Are there better solutions? You can bet on it. That’s why I am a proponent of the AU-6X scale. It allows for much greater transparency in the grading decision and gives quality 58s the pricing structure they deserve. Then they need to learn how to spot the AU-64s in MS-62 holders. Or pay up for an MS-64. Blindly trusting the number on the slab isn’t a safe game anymore.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
Chances this is UNC?
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...