Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Celtic Imitation of Constantine I
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="dougsmit, post: 3237940, member: 19463"]I lack the ability to look at such coins and say 'Celtic' as opposed to 'Indian' or several places in-between. Several people here have shown Roman Republican copies usually assigned to the Dacian region (?). I have none of those. My first is the Tiberius. At least a dozen of these were found in India and all I have seen are from the same die set. You can tell the original coin being copied was off center on the obverse since the copy dies lacked certain letters.</p><p>Tiberius AR denarius</p><p>[ATTACH=full]846904[/ATTACH] </p><p><br /></p><p>There are several mid to late 2nd century Roman copies around but I do not know if they all come from one region or where any were found. These have been around a while so it is not a recent find. </p><p><br /></p><p>Faustina I AR denarius</p><p>[ATTACH=full]846905[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p>Commodus AR denarius</p><p>[ATTACH=full]846906[/ATTACH] </p><p><br /></p><p>Septimius Severus AR denarius</p><p>[ATTACH=full]846908[/ATTACH] </p><p><br /></p><p>Later, we get the copies called Barbarous radiates. Like all copies, these vary from close to official style to barely recognizable scraps of metal. I have no idea how anyone is ever going to be able to assign these to a time and place in a meaningful way. Guessing is not hard. There are many people doing that.</p><p>This is my only Barbarous radiate with a left facing bust. The reverse figure holds a rudder. </p><p>[ATTACH=full]846911[/ATTACH] </p><p><br /></p><p>I'll skip Constantine who was well covered by others and go to Constantius II or similar Falling Horseman clearly marked as being made at the IIIIII mint.<img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie77" alt=":pompous:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]846920[/ATTACH] </p><p><br /></p><p>There are some periods where it is really hard to tell whether a coin is from a bad day at the regular mint or a good barbarous effort. Postumus, Carausius and Magnentius often fall in this category. Below is a Decentius that is in no danger of being confused with official mint product. </p><p>[ATTACH=full]846924[/ATTACH] </p><p><br /></p><p>Yes, I like unofficial ancient coins and there are a million of them out there that are rejected by most collectors and dealers. They may be interesting but make a terrible field of study for people who require absolute answers to every question. The inevitable question is how we tell ancient trash from modern fakes. We do the best we can.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="dougsmit, post: 3237940, member: 19463"]I lack the ability to look at such coins and say 'Celtic' as opposed to 'Indian' or several places in-between. Several people here have shown Roman Republican copies usually assigned to the Dacian region (?). I have none of those. My first is the Tiberius. At least a dozen of these were found in India and all I have seen are from the same die set. You can tell the original coin being copied was off center on the obverse since the copy dies lacked certain letters. Tiberius AR denarius [ATTACH=full]846904[/ATTACH] There are several mid to late 2nd century Roman copies around but I do not know if they all come from one region or where any were found. These have been around a while so it is not a recent find. Faustina I AR denarius [ATTACH=full]846905[/ATTACH] Commodus AR denarius [ATTACH=full]846906[/ATTACH] Septimius Severus AR denarius [ATTACH=full]846908[/ATTACH] Later, we get the copies called Barbarous radiates. Like all copies, these vary from close to official style to barely recognizable scraps of metal. I have no idea how anyone is ever going to be able to assign these to a time and place in a meaningful way. Guessing is not hard. There are many people doing that. This is my only Barbarous radiate with a left facing bust. The reverse figure holds a rudder. [ATTACH=full]846911[/ATTACH] I'll skip Constantine who was well covered by others and go to Constantius II or similar Falling Horseman clearly marked as being made at the IIIIII mint.:pompous: [ATTACH=full]846920[/ATTACH] There are some periods where it is really hard to tell whether a coin is from a bad day at the regular mint or a good barbarous effort. Postumus, Carausius and Magnentius often fall in this category. Below is a Decentius that is in no danger of being confused with official mint product. [ATTACH=full]846924[/ATTACH] Yes, I like unofficial ancient coins and there are a million of them out there that are rejected by most collectors and dealers. They may be interesting but make a terrible field of study for people who require absolute answers to every question. The inevitable question is how we tell ancient trash from modern fakes. We do the best we can.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Celtic Imitation of Constantine I
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...