Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Cappadocia and a Vespasian Hemidrachm
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="EWC3, post: 4577449, member: 93416"]I know next to nothing about this coinage - but I dug out my NC for 1992 for the article by Butcher "Rhodian Drachms" which seems to be a fairly recent account of this matter. I found the article very confusing in its presentation. Throughout Butcher gives data for silver in "theoretical denarii" - which are the notional denarii values of Cappadocian drachms (which he calls Rhodian drachms). These are only correct if his preconceived theories are correct.......</p><p><br /></p><p>If I have him correctly he thinks the Cappadocian drachm tariffed at 3/4 denarius (even though that sometimes over values it (!) against the denarius). That contrasts with Walker who had thought the Cappadocian drachm tariffed at a denarius and thus was over valued by about 25%. That looks much more likely to me and is in line with what Howgego said about Cistopheri</p><p><br /></p><p>I hesitate to say more as I hardly ever looked at these coins - but would be pleased to get a second opinion on the Butcher piece. </p><p><br /></p><p>I have a fear he just did not correctly understand historical seigniorage. That matter is vital if we are to understand how coins were tariffed at official exchanges, and thus the real politics of coin issue.</p><p><br /></p><p>Rob T[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="EWC3, post: 4577449, member: 93416"]I know next to nothing about this coinage - but I dug out my NC for 1992 for the article by Butcher "Rhodian Drachms" which seems to be a fairly recent account of this matter. I found the article very confusing in its presentation. Throughout Butcher gives data for silver in "theoretical denarii" - which are the notional denarii values of Cappadocian drachms (which he calls Rhodian drachms). These are only correct if his preconceived theories are correct....... If I have him correctly he thinks the Cappadocian drachm tariffed at 3/4 denarius (even though that sometimes over values it (!) against the denarius). That contrasts with Walker who had thought the Cappadocian drachm tariffed at a denarius and thus was over valued by about 25%. That looks much more likely to me and is in line with what Howgego said about Cistopheri I hesitate to say more as I hardly ever looked at these coins - but would be pleased to get a second opinion on the Butcher piece. I have a fear he just did not correctly understand historical seigniorage. That matter is vital if we are to understand how coins were tariffed at official exchanges, and thus the real politics of coin issue. Rob T[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Cappadocia and a Vespasian Hemidrachm
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...