Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;ccgnum, post: 28194, member: 1522&quot;]What AW said is the proper definition. &quot;prooflike&quot; is not an adjective, but rather a seperate type. For say, 1973 Canadian coins, you can have MS65 (regular circulation), PL65 (prooflike set), and SP65 (specimen set). Specimens and prooflikes are confused sometimes as they look very simular. Use of a term like MS65PL in Canadian grading is incorrect, I note NGC uses this incorrect assignment.</p><p><br /></p><p>The difference between a MS and PL strike is important as for certain dates, a circulation strike in better UNC grade may be a condition rarity, while the PL strikes may be relatively common in comparison. -ie. a MS65 1964 $1 is definately worth more than a PL65 of the same.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in