Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
Can you define artificial toning ?
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="V. Kurt Bellman, post: 3248473, member: 71723"]Farther down in that very same publication, there is THIS, Jim.</p><p><br /></p><p>"As a coin collector you are commissioned by posterity to handle each coin in your possession carefully and to preserve it in the condition in which it was received. What you do <span style="color: #ff4d4d">or fail to do</span> will be directly responsible for the condition and quality of your coins when they are owned and appreciated by future generations of numismatists."</p><p><br /></p><p>So sayeth the Bowers. Praise be to Bressett.</p><p><br /></p><p>Exaggerated for emphasis? Not guilty, Jim, not guilty.</p><p><br /></p><p>We have obligations to posterity and I take them seriously. I also interpret that as a directive to avoid and attempt to prevent ALL damage, including but not limited to, toning. Doing less than one's utmost to prevent toning is a "crime against numismatics". Of course, "one's utmost" is a moving and constantly changing standard over the eons. That does NOT minimize the obligation a whit. Intentionally using 1930's storage products is as heinous as pouring acid on coins.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="V. Kurt Bellman, post: 3248473, member: 71723"]Farther down in that very same publication, there is THIS, Jim. "As a coin collector you are commissioned by posterity to handle each coin in your possession carefully and to preserve it in the condition in which it was received. What you do [COLOR=#ff4d4d]or fail to do[/COLOR] will be directly responsible for the condition and quality of your coins when they are owned and appreciated by future generations of numismatists." So sayeth the Bowers. Praise be to Bressett. Exaggerated for emphasis? Not guilty, Jim, not guilty. We have obligations to posterity and I take them seriously. I also interpret that as a directive to avoid and attempt to prevent ALL damage, including but not limited to, toning. Doing less than one's utmost to prevent toning is a "crime against numismatics". Of course, "one's utmost" is a moving and constantly changing standard over the eons. That does NOT minimize the obligation a whit. Intentionally using 1930's storage products is as heinous as pouring acid on coins.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
Can you define artificial toning ?
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...