Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
Can you define artificial toning ?
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Lehigh96, post: 3234971, member: 15309"]Prove it! Show us an untoned coin, then show the exact same coin with market acceptable rainbow toning the next day. I have offered this challenge to hundreds of people over the years. To date, I am undefeated!</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>That also isn't true. What you are talking about is Type 1 Artificial Toning in which deep toning is used to hide surface flaws. This practice is typically reserved for expensive coins where a bump in grade means a large bump in price. What we are talking about for the purposes of this thread is Type 2 Artificial Toning where the attractive nature of the toning improves the eye appeal of the coin and creates a price premium. In that arena, most of the coins are inexpensive mint state common date coins with very little numismatic premium over their intrinsic value. And most of the time, the coin doctor will chose a fully lustrous coin. For example:</p><p><br /></p><p><img src="https://i.imgur.com/RA6GPNU.jpg" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p>It is worth mentioning that I didn't not create these terms: Type 1 & Type 2 AT. They were created and taught by Bob Campbell (not [USER=19094]@robec[/USER]), who was the ANA President for a while. They actually made a video about artificial toning about 20 years ago.</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>Again, Prove it! And are you claiming the coin shown above is NT simply because it is lustrous?</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>Toning is a fact of life, most original coins that are not dipped are going to be toned in some fashion. You can't simply ignore toning or colors, it is part of the hobby, and a very important part to many of us.</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>No, we are judging the coin based on its appearance. That appearance will have indicators of either AT/QT or NT/MA. It has nothing to do whether I like the coin or not. My example of the improper storage was simply to show that "intent" can't be used in the evaluation of the authenticity of the toning.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Lehigh96, post: 3234971, member: 15309"]Prove it! Show us an untoned coin, then show the exact same coin with market acceptable rainbow toning the next day. I have offered this challenge to hundreds of people over the years. To date, I am undefeated! That also isn't true. What you are talking about is Type 1 Artificial Toning in which deep toning is used to hide surface flaws. This practice is typically reserved for expensive coins where a bump in grade means a large bump in price. What we are talking about for the purposes of this thread is Type 2 Artificial Toning where the attractive nature of the toning improves the eye appeal of the coin and creates a price premium. In that arena, most of the coins are inexpensive mint state common date coins with very little numismatic premium over their intrinsic value. And most of the time, the coin doctor will chose a fully lustrous coin. For example: [IMG]https://i.imgur.com/RA6GPNU.jpg[/IMG] It is worth mentioning that I didn't not create these terms: Type 1 & Type 2 AT. They were created and taught by Bob Campbell (not [USER=19094]@robec[/USER]), who was the ANA President for a while. They actually made a video about artificial toning about 20 years ago. Again, Prove it! And are you claiming the coin shown above is NT simply because it is lustrous? Toning is a fact of life, most original coins that are not dipped are going to be toned in some fashion. You can't simply ignore toning or colors, it is part of the hobby, and a very important part to many of us. No, we are judging the coin based on its appearance. That appearance will have indicators of either AT/QT or NT/MA. It has nothing to do whether I like the coin or not. My example of the improper storage was simply to show that "intent" can't be used in the evaluation of the authenticity of the toning.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
Can you define artificial toning ?
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...