I've struggled for decades over how to draw the line between AT and NT. I found the BEST WAY FOR ME that works every time - refuse to pay ANY extra for ANY toning of ANY type.
You missed the point. I am just showing that there are terms in numismatics which no longer follow their technical definitions. That does not change the technical definitions themselves.
Market grading has forced an adjustment of how low MS grades are applied, but uncirculated still means uncirculated. I will agree that it is not necessarily a relevant term to use anymore, the same with AT, as market acceptability (of level of wear or appearance of toning) is what is relevant.
It seems that your question is whether or not intentionality makes the difference between natural and artificial toning. I would say it does not. If you can't tell the difference between toning that happened by accident and toning that happened by natural process but was intentional, what's the difference? It seems as though we're debating how many angels can dance of the head of a pin. Shoe polish, paint, etc. are another topic.
That works for me, too. Good thing I'm not looking for attractively-toned coins, though, because I'm sure not getting many of them.
Yes I do, but that's because there are many different ways, many different methods, to produce artificial toning. And the bad ones, the ones that are blatantly and obviously artificial - those are the ones that are easily identifiable. I don't "pretend" anything, I have seen it done in a matter of hours with my own eyes. And that is 100% true. Now, you ask people to "prove it". But lemme ask you, how exactly could that be done ? How could anybody ever prove this to you ? It simply can't be done. Do you know why ? Because you're going to be the one making the decision as to whether or not the proof is valid. Just suppose Paul that I do as you suggest. That I take a picture of a coin and post it here - today. Then tomorrow I post a picture of the very same coin with gorgeous, market acceptable toning on it. What are ya gonna do then ? You're gonna say that doesn't prove anything because for it to prove anything you'd have to take my word for it that the pictures actually were taken one day apart, and that the toning was done in 1 day or less. But you're not going to take my word for anything Paul, any more than you take my word in your quote up above. You have already stated, categorically, that you don't take my word for anything. Or let's say somebody else does it, are you going to believe them and and take their word for it ? I suspect not. Ya see Paul, the one and only way that anybody could prove it to you would be for you to be there and see it happen with your own eyes. So nobody is ever going to be able to "prove" anything to you by posting something on this forum. But if ya want, we'll put the shoe on the other foot. You said - So OK Paul, prove it !
Now Doug, maybe it’s not all that dire. Maybe Paul HAS seen it with his own eyes. Maybe he has even DONE it with his own hands. Maybe, just maybe, Paul’s protestations are merely a feeble attempt to protect his questionable profitable niche. Maybe he should prove that’s not what’s up here, huh? Doesn’t EVERYBOODY enjoy being challenged to prove the unprovable?
Use a coin that has distinctive marks and make sure the photos are good enough to positively identify the coin from those marks. Take a photo of the coin next to a current newspaper heading in both photos. Proof. Let's see someone do it.
I believe my point in starting this thread has been made. But just in case it hasn't, let me now ask the same but slightly different question. Let's suppose that we take any of the scenarios I described in my initial post, but instead of adding humidity and increasing the temperature, we store the coins at normal room conditions. The only thing that is different is the intent - we do all of this deliberately. Is the toning that is produced then AT or NT/market acceptable ? And we'll do the same thing with the sealed box. Only this time we place the coins in the box, and pump in the same gasses but of the same concentration as they would be in room air. And we let it take a longer period of time, years or even decades. Is that toning then AT or NT/market acceptable ?
I also don’t get “many” either, but I do get SOME. My local area is awash with toning critics more severe than me.
If reasonable and ordinary care/curation/preservation could have prevented it, “The Bellman Criterion” labels it Artificial Toning per se. End of story. I can see no reason to financially reward suboptimal curation skills.
But how do you feel about spoiled grapes? I mean, proper curation would have kept that sugar intact, either by freezing or drying, instead of letting it rot into ethanol...
Do I like the color on toned coins? Yes, of course. Am I going to pay extra for that color? No, don't be silly. I buy the coin. Not the color. If any of the coins in my collection are toned they toned naturally. Even if was stored incorrectly or in an album.
Anaxs Summer Workshop 2019 Coin Magic through Chemistry 4 hrs. Set their color Free !( for a price increase) Gas provided with course. Course enrollment limit to 250. Jim
I got bored after the first two pages so I agree with the old saying "Beauty is in the eye of the beholder" and also the one about "a fool and his money". "One born every minute" comes to mind also.