Featured Can you define artificial toning ?

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by GDJMSP, Nov 12, 2018.

  1. TypeCoin971793

    TypeCoin971793 Just a random guy on the internet

    It is just at valuless as applying the term “uncirciulated” to an early US coin.
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Jaelus

    Jaelus The Hungarian Antiquarian Supporter

    Valueless terms utilized elsewhere do not legitimize a valueless definition here.
     
  4. Packrat

    Packrat Well-Known Member

    JeffB-that is how the judge described pornography. Right you are.
     
  5. V. Kurt Bellman

    V. Kurt Bellman Yes, I'm blunt! Get over your "feeeeelings".

    I've struggled for decades over how to draw the line between AT and NT. I found the BEST WAY FOR ME that works every time - refuse to pay ANY extra for ANY toning of ANY type.
     
  6. TypeCoin971793

    TypeCoin971793 Just a random guy on the internet

    You missed the point. I am just showing that there are terms in numismatics which no longer follow their technical definitions. That does not change the technical definitions themselves.
     
  7. Jaelus

    Jaelus The Hungarian Antiquarian Supporter

    Market grading has forced an adjustment of how low MS grades are applied, but uncirculated still means uncirculated. I will agree that it is not necessarily a relevant term to use anymore, the same with AT, as market acceptability (of level of wear or appearance of toning) is what is relevant.
     
  8. halfcent1793

    halfcent1793 Well-Known Member

    It seems that your question is whether or not intentionality makes the difference between natural and artificial toning. I would say it does not. If you can't tell the difference between toning that happened by accident and toning that happened by natural process but was intentional, what's the difference?

    It seems as though we're debating how many angels can dance of the head of a pin.

    Shoe polish, paint, etc. are another topic.
     
  9. -jeffB

    -jeffB Greshams LEO Supporter

    That works for me, too. Good thing I'm not looking for attractively-toned coins, though, because I'm sure not getting many of them.
     
  10. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    Yes I do, but that's because there are many different ways, many different methods, to produce artificial toning. And the bad ones, the ones that are blatantly and obviously artificial - those are the ones that are easily identifiable.

    I don't "pretend" anything, I have seen it done in a matter of hours with my own eyes. And that is 100% true.

    Now, you ask people to "prove it". But lemme ask you, how exactly could that be done ? How could anybody ever prove this to you ? It simply can't be done. Do you know why ? Because you're going to be the one making the decision as to whether or not the proof is valid.

    Just suppose Paul that I do as you suggest. That I take a picture of a coin and post it here - today. Then tomorrow I post a picture of the very same coin with gorgeous, market acceptable toning on it. What are ya gonna do then ? You're gonna say that doesn't prove anything because for it to prove anything you'd have to take my word for it that the pictures actually were taken one day apart, and that the toning was done in 1 day or less.

    But you're not going to take my word for anything Paul, any more than you take my word in your quote up above. You have already stated, categorically, that you don't take my word for anything.

    Or let's say somebody else does it, are you going to believe them and and take their word for it ? I suspect not.

    Ya see Paul, the one and only way that anybody could prove it to you would be for you to be there and see it happen with your own eyes. So nobody is ever going to be able to "prove" anything to you by posting something on this forum.

    But if ya want, we'll put the shoe on the other foot. You said -

    So OK Paul, prove it !
     
  11. V. Kurt Bellman

    V. Kurt Bellman Yes, I'm blunt! Get over your "feeeeelings".

    Now Doug, maybe it’s not all that dire. Maybe Paul HAS seen it with his own eyes. Maybe he has even DONE it with his own hands. Maybe, just maybe, Paul’s protestations are merely a feeble attempt to protect his questionable profitable niche. Maybe he should prove that’s not what’s up here, huh? Doesn’t EVERYBOODY enjoy being challenged to prove the unprovable?
     
  12. Jaelus

    Jaelus The Hungarian Antiquarian Supporter

    Use a coin that has distinctive marks and make sure the photos are good enough to positively identify the coin from those marks.

    Take a photo of the coin next to a current newspaper heading in both photos.

    Proof.

    Let's see someone do it.
     
    Lehigh96 likes this.
  13. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    I believe my point in starting this thread has been made. But just in case it hasn't, let me now ask the same but slightly different question. Let's suppose that we take any of the scenarios I described in my initial post, but instead of adding humidity and increasing the temperature, we store the coins at normal room conditions. The only thing that is different is the intent - we do all of this deliberately. Is the toning that is produced then AT or NT/market acceptable ?

    And we'll do the same thing with the sealed box. Only this time we place the coins in the box, and pump in the same gasses but of the same concentration as they would be in room air. And we let it take a longer period of time, years or even decades. Is that toning then AT or NT/market acceptable ?
     
  14. TypeCoin971793

    TypeCoin971793 Just a random guy on the internet

    I’ll see what I can do
     
  15. V. Kurt Bellman

    V. Kurt Bellman Yes, I'm blunt! Get over your "feeeeelings".

    I also don’t get “many” either, but I do get SOME. My local area is awash with toning critics more severe than me.
     
  16. V. Kurt Bellman

    V. Kurt Bellman Yes, I'm blunt! Get over your "feeeeelings".

    If reasonable and ordinary care/curation/preservation could have prevented it, “The Bellman Criterion” labels it Artificial Toning per se. End of story.

    I can see no reason to financially reward suboptimal curation skills.
     
  17. -jeffB

    -jeffB Greshams LEO Supporter

    But how do you feel about spoiled grapes? I mean, proper curation would have kept that sugar intact, either by freezing or drying, instead of letting it rot into ethanol...
     
    Dave Waterstraat and Jaelus like this.
  18. Collecting Nut

    Collecting Nut Borderline Hoarder

    Do I like the color on toned coins? Yes, of course. Am I going to pay extra for that color? No, don't be silly.

    I buy the coin. Not the color. If any of the coins in my collection are toned they toned naturally. Even if was stored incorrectly or in an album.
     
  19. desertgem

    desertgem Senior Errer Collecktor

    Anaxs Summer Workshop 2019
    Coin Magic through Chemistry 4 hrs. Set their color Free !( for a price increase)
    Gas provided with course. Course enrollment limit to 250.

    :) Jim
     
  20. ToppCatt

    ToppCatt ToppCatt

     
  21. ToppCatt

    ToppCatt ToppCatt

    I got bored after the first two pages so I agree with the old saying "Beauty is in the eye of the beholder" and also the one about "a fool and his money". "One born every minute" comes to mind also.
     
    V. Kurt Bellman likes this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page