Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;eddiespin, post: 696632, member: 4920&quot;]I&#039;ll tell you, I don&#039;t agree with everything you just said, but with much of it. Let me try this, again, on what I&#039;m saying...</p><p><br /></p><p>Let’s just take the MS grades, as an example. Forget about the circulated grades, for now. I&#039;m just trying to simplify this. What are they, the major TPGs, doing, there? They’re placing the coins submitted to them for grading in general tiers, which, let&#039;s acknowledge, are everything but decimal-point accurate. And, with respect to a lot of these grades, there’s still room for error, still room for disagreement. </p><p><br /></p><p>Now, when I said I believe I can teach people, from a cold start, how to do that job, as good as the major TPGs do it, inside a week, you, of course, have to be fair to me, and give me their resources. Inside a week, though, like I said, I believe I could have these &quot;walk-ons&quot; grading as good (meaning, “as accurate”) as these major TPGs are grading. Read that statement, again, if you believe you need to. And, while you are at that, I believe I elaborated on it, some, just after Doug’s reply...read that, too. But, I don’t happen to believe it’s like Jim is suggesting, a superior skill set, which distinguishes these grades. Their superior knowledge...by virtue of doing the same thing, over and over, again, day-in and day-out, for years, and years...only enables them to grade quicker, not better. In short, it&#039;s their resources that distinguish them, and their grades. That&#039;s it. IMHO...[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in