Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;medoraman, post: 1500828, member: 26302&quot;]If it was supposed to have the S mintmark, then it would have been a proof. On that date the San Francisco mint only made proofs. Therefor, it would have been observable by things like extra sharp details, sharp rims, etc that the coin was a proof, and simply missing the S mintmark. </p><p><br /></p><p>While its POSSIBLE for a genuine no S proof dime to be found not in a proof set, its extremely unlikely. Almost all of these will be found in a 1975 proof set issued from the mint. Any proof coins not in such a set is only because someone smashed the set and took the coins out.</p><p><br /></p><p>Hope that helps.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in