can i naturally tone a coin, artifically?

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by WingedLiberty, Oct 9, 2010.

  1. rzage

    rzage What Goes Around Comes Around .

    For those that say AT and NT are the same because it happens chemically in the same way , I just can't buy it . Why are they doing it ? In most cases either to hide deffects or to just plain make money . C'mon we're not kids , pouring chemicals on coins is just not ethical .
    rzage
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. kaparthy

    kaparthy Well-Known Member

    The theory is based on the fact that we know the difference between being sincere and acting sincere.

    Written out on paper, the words are the same words, but spoken, the nuances are different.

    Myself, I like little paper envelopes for coins, makes me feel like a traditionalist. I have had mine for over 15 years. No two coins reacted the same.

    When I started in 1993, I put together two Whitmans of Mercury Dimes (lacking the two keys). Can't say what did or did not, does or does not, will or will not. Some did; some did not.

    I have a couple of cigar boxes that smell herby. Some coins change; others do not.

    I put some over cleaned Morgans in a wool suit I never wear. Maybe; maybe not.

    I have seen coins from old leather wallets look gracefully aged and other look slimy.

    Urban legend has it that a dealer can tone a coin with cigar smoke but I have been behind the counter when someone brought in silver coins and right away I asked "You smoke?" so I don't know about that cigar fooling anyone.

    In time, with experience, you get a feeling for AT versus NT, even though you can argue chemistry until you are blue in the face.

    In fact: the ancient Greeks used to believe that the better argument was closer to the truth, so they learned to argue well ... and it bankrupted their philosophy.

    Spin this any way you want. There is a difference.

    Now: can you artificially tone a coin to make it look natural? Semantics and sophistry aside: Yes. How? Gently, as if it took forever... even though it did not...
     
  4. BadThad

    BadThad Calibrated for Lincolns

    You might as well just make a forum section for this.....or maybe just merge all the threads together. Where's krispy when you need him? :D

    :burger-flip:
     
  5. Cringely

    Cringely Active Member

    If it's a copper coin, putting it in your gym socks will tone it to a very nice chocolate brown in a few weeks. Try it with a new cent or token. I have no idea what gym socks will do to silver. Disclaimer, technique does not work very well with freshly washed socks.
     
  6. stealer

    stealer Roller of Coins

    Wouldn't it have a "suspicious" smell to it? :D
     
  7. sgiorgis

    sgiorgis Student of Numismatics

    GREAT Point, jello! My Lincoln proofs from last year (2009) are toning like a banshee, even in their OGP!!!
    Steve
     
  8. brotheratom

    brotheratom Witty coin reference here

    So the questions we need to all ask ourselves, do we like coins with toning (AT or otherwise) or do we prefer coins in pristine condition?
    I'm sure each of us has our own opinions.
     
  9. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    No, we're not kids. But then we're not talking about pouring chemicals on a coin as being the same as natural toning either. Nobody, in all the threads there have been on this subject has ever said that.

    What we are talking about when we say it is the same, except for intent, is when it really is the same. A couple examples would be, intentionally placing coins in an album that you know will cause the coins to tone. Intentionally leaving your coins on the window sill because you know that will cause them to tone. Placing your coins in a sealed container and then injecting the specific gasses into that container that will cause your coins to tone. Placing your coins in manila envelopes because you know that cause them to tone.

    Every single one of these things, and there are many more, are 100% indentical to natural toning. And every single one of them is caused by the very same things.

    So how can anyone possibly say that they are any different ? Except for intent.

    In simpler terms - natural toning happens by accident. Artificial toning happens on purpose. That really is the only difference.
     
  10. WingedLiberty

    WingedLiberty Well-Known Member

    but i think the point is ... if PCGS blesses a coin as NT ... it has a lot more value ... i believe that NT has certain characterisitcs that only happen over a long time ... (right?)

    PCGS will just see a coin that was toned in an album over 10+ years ...
    they wont know if the coin was placed there by someone with no knowledge of toning ...
    or if it was placed there by someone that had the hope it would tone ...
    right?

    i mean if TPG's make judgement of AT vs NT ...
    then if you do something that gets blessed by PCGS at NT ...
    then it's all good

    GDJ, you yourself pointed out AT coins that had circular untoned spots where someone dropped the liquid toning solution ... and blessed coins with nice warm toning around the rim from an album ... when you blessed that latter coin ... you didnt know if the person placed it in an album by accident or on purpose (with an intention to tone)
     
  11. jello

    jello Not Expert★NormL®

    Only one of my 2009-P&D Mint is toning! the last set I got as year end close out from US Mint

    this the LP-3
     

    Attached Files:

  12. lincolncent

    lincolncent Future Storm Chaser Guy

    I have some nicely toned '09 cents that I did absolutely nothing to. While its not a few days, its still a short period of time. So I have to a gree with GDJ here.
     
  13. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    Wrong. The thing that makes that statement wrong is the use of the word only.

    You can take a coin that has virtually no toning to speak of, at least none that most will notice. Place that coin in a sealed box, pump gasses into that box, and in a few hours that coin will be as toned as a Morgan that sat in an album for 30 years. And neither you nor anybody else can tell which one took a few hours or decades.

    Right.

    Again, right. And that is why I say - if you can't tell, does it matter ?
     
    Endeavor likes this.
  14. sgiorgis

    sgiorgis Student of Numismatics

    Mine are the S Proofs.. I'll try to upload a pic. Not as eye appealing as yours! :(
    Steve
     
  15. desertgem

    desertgem Senior Errer Collecktor Supporter

    Amateurs can mess up when trying to do AT, that isn't the same as a "professional doc" doing AT. It is easy to see brillo pad scratches on a coin, but much harder to see bristle brush or green thorn use on a coin ( you can, just much harder). It is easy to spot bad AT, impossible to spot excellent AT, IMO.

    Jim


     
  16. Leadfoot

    Leadfoot there is no spoon

    I suspect you were using the word "you" in a general sense, because I don't believe for a second that WingedLiberty possesses that skill, and the process (as I understand it) is quite a bit more complex than it is described above. Respectfully....Mike
     
  17. Lehigh96

    Lehigh96 Toning Enthusiast

    Creating AT coins that can pass for NT is not an easy task at all. Doug may know some that can do it, but they doesn't make the skills commonplace. In other words, I agree with you Mike.
     
  18. WingedLiberty

    WingedLiberty Well-Known Member

    right ... i am just a computer programmer not a chemist ... i dont know squat about toning coins ... i just like the way some of them look (fond of the rim toning. not so much the crazy rainbows) ... but have no intention of paying 3x, 4x, 5x to buy one

    i just thought since i have about 40 common mixed date BU morgans MS61-MS63 or so ... it might be fun to experiment with one or two ... not with the intention to sell ... but just to see what happens
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page