Can I ask a stupid question?

Those are much better pics, so I have to agree it is a proof.

Therefore, no, it does not qualify for the FS designation…imo…Spark

 

Log in or Sign up to hide this ad.

But, why? Would that not be an anomaly with this date and MM? I am setting aside the FS issue, in asking.

 

After doing a little research the 1968-S Nickels were made both in proof and for circulation.

 

Yes, I am aware. That is not the thrust of my question to Mr. Spark, and I guess to others that opine it is Proof, in the specific case of this date and MM.

 

Not sure what you're asking here. Is it unusual to find a proof in circulation? Kinda, but not that unusual. Is it unusual to find an S-mint proof? Certainly not for 1968.

 

Look at the rims.

 

How to turn a simple question (and answer) into a friggin disaster.

 

There are 5 & 6 Step regular strikes. Rare? Yes.

 

I am interested if the members leaning toward a Proof Strike think the photos are clear enough to examine for a Doubled Die, or a RPM.

 

Why?

 

Its the rims that will indicate a proof, not anyother ;reflections,shiney, pricey, etc.

See the rims below

 

Again, why headbanging?
Members have had good and interesting replies and observations, no?

 

Bingo but we haven't seen the 'third side' of OP's coin. I still say it's a proof without viewing such.

 

Same with me. It’s a proof, impaired but a proof.

 

So, you have some proof coins with a chamfered edge?

 

Take a good picture of the "third side", the edge. Squared - proof, chamfered - business