Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;hereittis2, post: 509740, member: 16891&quot;]thanks for the responses.........all plausible.....but ..........</p><p>if what thenoost says about red book mtg #&#039;s............i.e.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>1959 no 2x2&nbsp; 49k+</p><p>1961 no 2x2&nbsp; 59k+&nbsp; &nbsp; (through 2008 red book)&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; </p><p>2009 no 2x2&nbsp; 49k+&nbsp; &nbsp; (that in itself raises ? why? bowers or no.....)</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>it seems to be an issue with redbook....</p><p>more a puzzle then ever.........including 2x2 mtg.numbers</p><p>again i thank you for the responses............more d&amp;d required....</p><p>but food for thought..................thanks[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in