Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;dltsrq, post: 7844707, member: 75482&quot;]In an old thread resurrected today I noticed some discussion of whether or not a fourrée coin can also be a cast. I thought I would comment in a new thread rather than pile on a old one. The answer to the the title question is &#039;yes&#039;, sort of, if the fourrée is produced by the cliché method. <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clich%C3%A9_forgery" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clich%C3%A9_forgery" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cliché_forgery</a></p><p><br /></p><p>The cliché method is also described by George Boon in his article &#039;Counterfeit Coins in Roman Britain&#039; <u>in</u> J Casey and R Reece (eds), <i>Coins and the Archaeologist</i>, Seaby / London, 1988, pp. 102-188.</p><p><br /></p><p>Lastly, I found this paper just now, which I have not yet had an opportunity to digest but which looks interesting: <a href="https://www.britnumsoc.org/publications/Digital%20BNJ/pdfs/1994_BNJ_64_4.pdf" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://www.britnumsoc.org/publications/Digital%20BNJ/pdfs/1994_BNJ_64_4.pdf" rel="nofollow">https://www.britnumsoc.org/publications/Digital BNJ/pdfs/1994_BNJ_64_4.pdf</a>[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in