Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;GDJMSP, post: 2795368, member: 112&quot;]It was &#039;73 John and it&#039;s easy to check. Finding a Proof &#039;73 or later that is not cameo is pretty dang tough. I won&#039;t say it&#039;s impossible as I think I might have seen one or two over the years, but that&#039;s it. But the &#039;72 sets and earlier, cameo examples are just as tough to find.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in