Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;physics-fan3.14, post: 2609917, member: 19165&quot;]I can&#039;t tell if y&#039;all are joking, or smoking crack. </p><p><br /></p><p>The cameo on that coin is spectacular. It is a no questions asked CAM at the very least, and I see no reason at all why it wouldn&#039;t be UCAM. The general perception is that PCGS is stricter on proofs, so DCAM might be trickier - but it compares quite favorably to many of the coins in the Heritage Archives: <a href="https://coins.ha.com/c/search-results.zx?Ntk=SI_Titles-Desc&amp;Ns=Time%7C1&amp;Ne=47&amp;N=51+790+231+4294967153+4294967161+314+573+766&amp;Ntt=1956&amp;ic4=Refine-CoinDesignation-102615" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://coins.ha.com/c/search-results.zx?Ntk=SI_Titles-Desc&amp;Ns=Time%7C1&amp;Ne=47&amp;N=51+790+231+4294967153+4294967161+314+573+766&amp;Ntt=1956&amp;ic4=Refine-CoinDesignation-102615" rel="nofollow">https://coins.ha.com/c/search-results.zx?Ntk=SI_Titles-Desc&amp;Ns=Time|1&amp;Ne=47&amp;N=51+790+231+4294967153+4294967161+314+573+766&amp;Ntt=1956&amp;ic4=Refine-CoinDesignation-102615</a></p><p><br /></p><p>I think y&#039;all are being way too harsh on the OP&#039;s coin, which is gorgeous and has a very strong cameo.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in