Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;NPCoin, post: 627801, member: 5629&quot;]The original poster mentioned using more stickers to further &quot;refine&quot; the grades. I suggest, rather than using more stickers, use comments that are easily assessable via the internet.&nbsp; This is completely feasible, unless, of course, there is a reason why they do not want the public to know what their reasoning is behind their determinations.</p><p><br /></p><p>Yet, regardless of what the TPGs do or do not do, it is quite feasible for CAC to publish comments about a specific coin online and make it available. I believe this would accomplish the same purpose as having even more stickers to worry about. That&#039;s why I mentioned it.</p><p><br /></p><p>Within each sticker type, coins may be further separated by comments explaining why the coin is where it is.&nbsp; Exceptional traits may be noted as well. In this way, I do see CAC as being useful to collectors in the sight-unseen market. Otherwise, I still hold that CAC&#039;s usefulness realistically stops mostly with speculators.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in