Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;wxcoin, post: 6444369, member: 74624&quot;]Good comments in this thread.&nbsp; I read the JA interview article and understand his reasoning for starting CAC from a dealer- economics viewpoint.&nbsp; However, this just underscores the weakness in the TPG grading system.&nbsp; If a coin that&#039;s technically graded MS 65 hurts the market value of other similarly graded coins then one needs to ask why?&nbsp; What are the measurable features that separate A, B, and C coins?&nbsp; Do we really need another company determining this or should the TPGs like NGC and PCGS provide more meaningful information on their slabs (ie, strike, luster, eye appeal, ...) that would do away with an additional layer, such as CAC?&nbsp; I realize that this topic has been around the block countless times in this forum so don&#039;t shoot me.&nbsp; Yes, the reality is that CAC coins generally bring premiums.&nbsp; I wonder what percentage of non-beaned NGC and PCGS slabs have gone to CAC already and how many have been resubmitted?[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in