Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;GoldFinger1969, post: 6429487, member: 73489&quot;]Wasn&#039;t the bigger mistake on the part of the TPG ?</p><p><br /></p><p><b><u>True, Albanese probably blessed a coin at MS-62 that JohnM says probably should have been no higher than AU-58.&nbsp; But (without knowing the coin) we all know that even PROPERLY graded coins can look better in AU-58 than low-60&#039;s MS.</u></b></p><p><b><u><br /></u></b></p><p><b><u>If this WAS a good-looking AU-58 -- incorrectly called an MS-62 -- then CAC probably should NOT have given it a sticker because while it may have looked &quot;good for a 62&quot; it SHOULD have been an AU-58.&nbsp; </u></b></p><p><br /></p><p>Not only was it numerically graded too high, but they put it in the Mint State section instead of the About Uncirculated section.</p><p><br /></p><p>&quot;Sliders&quot; can be tough for the TPGs and apparently CAC, too.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in