Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
CAC Question
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="imrich, post: 3398482, member: 22331"]My collection specialty is low mintage Gem grade Double Eagles, preferably PQ or/+ CAC approved. I watch the majority of internet offerings, late at night, early morning. When seeing a newly offered Gem PQ date I usually purchase in a certain price range. I sent the company an e-mail purchase statement, asking for an invoice. When an invoice wasn't received by noon, I wrote the owner who approves all sales, asking if he had been notified of my order. He stated not being informed, investigated and said the coin was sold, a statement occasionally used when a coin was offered at an improper price. He said he had another, for ~$1500 less, and he'd send an image. I received an image of a PQ MS65 Double Eagle, same date/TPG as my choice, except with "bag rub" on rim/devices, and "bag marks" in the fields and devices.</p><p><br /></p><p>He was indignant that I wouldn't accept a "top tier" TPG PQ coin at face grading. I'm sorry but I've CACed MS63 non-PQ coins with greater luster, less "dings".</p><p><br /></p><p>There is appreciable "Top Tier" TPG grading disparity today!</p><p><br /></p><p>JMHO[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="imrich, post: 3398482, member: 22331"]My collection specialty is low mintage Gem grade Double Eagles, preferably PQ or/+ CAC approved. I watch the majority of internet offerings, late at night, early morning. When seeing a newly offered Gem PQ date I usually purchase in a certain price range. I sent the company an e-mail purchase statement, asking for an invoice. When an invoice wasn't received by noon, I wrote the owner who approves all sales, asking if he had been notified of my order. He stated not being informed, investigated and said the coin was sold, a statement occasionally used when a coin was offered at an improper price. He said he had another, for ~$1500 less, and he'd send an image. I received an image of a PQ MS65 Double Eagle, same date/TPG as my choice, except with "bag rub" on rim/devices, and "bag marks" in the fields and devices. He was indignant that I wouldn't accept a "top tier" TPG PQ coin at face grading. I'm sorry but I've CACed MS63 non-PQ coins with greater luster, less "dings". There is appreciable "Top Tier" TPG grading disparity today! JMHO[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
CAC Question
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...