Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Publius2, post: 8613793, member: 105571&quot;]I have spent a lot of effort trying to decrypt the gentleman&#039;s meaning in his various posts.&nbsp; In this thread, I believe he is saying that coin owners have or will have their assets&#039; values degraded (a monetary loss, therefore a potential legal tort) by changes in the grading standards.&nbsp; He uses a civil case where there was egregious mischaracterization that constituted fraud to justify his position.&nbsp; </p><p><br /></p><p>Granted that tort cases in this country sometimes defy common sense, I don&#039;t believe that his argument would hold up if a particular or a class action suit was filed.&nbsp; The court case he cited demonstrated the variable nature of grading when performed by acknowledged experts.&nbsp; Secondly, so long as the service offered by a new grading standard is explicitly defined, therefore no fraud, then potential customers have the option of partaking or not.</p><p><br /></p><p>I would suggest that his arguments would be clearer if he could refrain from the excessive use of adjectives and adverbs.&nbsp; Simple, declarative sentences work best.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in