Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;imrich, post: 2434284, member: 22331&quot;]I believe an objective analyst reading our posts would conclude that we are stating similar attitudes, that aren&#039;t reflective of prominent TPG practices.</p><p><br /></p><p>Regardless, it&#039;s believed that only a class action adjudication will correct the current grading conditions which can be shown by current and past studies that TPG aren&#039;t in agreement as to different organizational grading standards, much less theirs. An action similar to that of the PCI, without &quot;outside experts&quot; would be a fair method of determining reliability and potential damages.</p><p><br /></p><p>A cross section of valuable coins (e.g. minimum 4 figure publicly stated value), having been securely removed from the Defendant firms holders, being submitted to the stated Senior Numismatists Et Al for their recorded grades. This process would determine credibility/reliability of those in control of decisions. The time allotted for grading would be comparable to that normally provided to the professional graders. The process would be repeated by the professional graders. The grades would be compared to those assigned before coin removal from their respective slabs.</p><p><br /></p><p>The aforementioned process would determine corporate capability by leaders who profess accuracy, and employees who implement corporate policy. The specimens should be evaluated&nbsp; by a group of independently renown &quot;experts&quot; involved in additional grading efforts, to assess grades relative to published A.N.A. professed implemented objective grade standards.</p><p><br /></p><p>It&#039;s suspected that this process would reflect results realized by past and current independent grading analysis efforts.</p><p><br /></p><p>JMHO[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in