Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;imrich, post: 2380412, member: 22331&quot;]Thank you for your objective response. I personally haven&#039;t reviewed the case or followed the ramblings/posts of the individual to which you refer. I&#039;m more interested in the presentations of participants in major trials pertaining to an industry which I personally believe has lost it&#039;s &quot;bearings&quot;.</p><p><br /></p><p>I believe the precedents have been/are set for a course correction, with the current states legislation, and inter-state commerce cooperative efforts of the Federal Judicium/Judicia.</p><p><br /></p><p>I trust that your evaluation, and that of others posting here, relating to proper disclosure are correct.</p><p><br /></p><p>The current conditions are probably an &quot;opportunity&quot; for a competent law firm (after a forthright/candid discussion with the plaintiff) to show the adverse mental disposition of the aggrieved.</p><p><br /></p><p>I personally believe an investigative/expose effort by stellar individuals of like ilk to Morley Safer, Mike Wallace or Barbara Walters as a judicial precursor would have better presentation/reception than that of known prominent law firms, and the referenced individual.</p><p><br /></p><p>JMHO[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in