Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;imrich, post: 2232820, member: 22331&quot;]It&#039;s understood that the goal of CAC was to show which coins were meeting the &quot;standard&quot; of premier TPG. </p><p><br /></p><p>I personally believe that the firm is accomplishing the goal which was intended, and believe their consistency is very even.</p><p><br /></p><p>I collect those coins which I believe document the deteriorating grading process of the &quot;top tier&quot; TPG. I personally have collected relatively expensive GEM coins of the same type/date/MM/grade, certified by the same TPG that are believed to have appreciable grading disparities.</p><p><br /></p><p>The PCI Coin Grading, Inc. lawsuit has already created a precedent for litigious action with a neutral fourth party supplying crucial grading evidence for allocating Judicial damages. I expect future action where a portion of the fourth party evidence may be CAC generated.</p><p><br /></p><p>JMHO[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in