Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;mark_h, post: 628667, member: 3726&quot;]Well I too can understand the reasons they do not do this - and yes one of them is the submissions. They might as well rake in money like NGC and PCGS - I am not saying there is anything wrong with this. PS - Yes I have and plan to use both - I really see nothing wrong with what any of them do.</p><p><br /></p><p>The one thing I have not seen mentioned (and I am kind of surpised nobody mentioned it) - is just because a coin was sent to CAC and did not get a sticker - does that mean it is a bad coin or wrongly graded coin? I am sure CAC makes mistakes also. It almost seems like everybody assumes you sent a coin in and if it does not get a sticker, well there must be something wrong.&nbsp; When I say &quot;wrong&quot; I mean it in a bad way - over graded, cleaned or something like that.&nbsp; Where as it could be a really nice coin that just did not get a sticker - whatever the reason, but it would be nice to know.&nbsp; That brings up a question - do they tell the submitter why it does not get a sticker?</p><p><br /></p><p>I think my biggest bug-a-boo is that it seems some tend to assume that well, it is a CAC coin so it must be the best of the best(or something like that).&nbsp; Just like some people assume PCGS or NGC graded coins are the best of the best. I just disagree with that type assumption. Still I am not knocking CAC I just think the concept can be done better. All in my humble little chubby opinion.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in