Reply to Thread

Message:: [QUOTE="mrbrklyn, post: 469792, member: 4381"]That always makes me loose sleep. Did you miss everything I wrote or are you just going to pretend I didn't say it and annotate it. Let me drop a clue stick on you, although I doubt it will matter... CAC is a scam... And here is another.... we aint discussing grading standards, as bad an as invalid as they are...and they are irrelevant to this discussion. You understand basic logic?  A=B B=C  A=C? There is no amount of grading that the TPGs can do which doesn't allow CAC to create a false market with there stickers.  They are NOT ethical. CAC isn't leaving ANY GRADE, or a slab.  They are Parasites on the TPG backs, which frankly they deserve because their own grading standards are DUBIOUS, CHANGES, and has no proven validation process leaving the market open scams of people such as CAC. And why shouldn't CAC scam all you gullible hobbyist.  Frankly you refuse to learn anything from more serious fields and the TPGs themselves have exploited similar exploitative aspects of the market especially the 70 grade.  My friend, I aint selling you my grade opinions.  And I don't care if you like my grading or not.  I don't know why we are discussing this.  Its all irrelevant.  Blah blah blah..what does that have to do with the CAC scam?  Do you think I can't identify their scam unless I have 30 years of faulty grading practice? All this is irrelevant to the current discussion.  Ruben[/QUOTE]