Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Cabinet tone is not a priority for me, buuuuut....
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Severus Alexander, post: 2653081, member: 84744"]Wow, thanks for resurrecting this awesome thread! With not even a month of CT behind me, I can't imagine the number of great threads I've missed.</p><p><br /></p><p>Here's a variety of classic "cabinet toned" pieces I like:</p><p><br /></p><p>Drachm, Philip III (Arrhidaios) 323-319 BC, Price P66. Sorry for the lo-res photo. (I know there's a lot of controversy over when the facial features of Alexander first made it onto the coins, but this one looks particularly Alex-ish to me):</p><p>[ATTACH=full]587231[/ATTACH] </p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>Denarius, T. Quinctius Flamininus, 126 BC (apex to l. on obverse; Macedonian shield below on rev.)</p><p>[ATTACH=full]587232[/ATTACH] </p><p><br /></p><p>Toned siliquae aren't getting a lot of love in this thread, so... Valens, Arles ("Constantina"), 364-7. Scarce type & mint, it seems. RIC IX Arles 6d.</p><p>[ATTACH=full]587237[/ATTACH] </p><p><br /></p><p>And going outside the classics:</p><p><br /></p><p>Shapur I (242-270), drachm:</p><p>[ATTACH=full]587238[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Severus Alexander, post: 2653081, member: 84744"]Wow, thanks for resurrecting this awesome thread! With not even a month of CT behind me, I can't imagine the number of great threads I've missed. Here's a variety of classic "cabinet toned" pieces I like: Drachm, Philip III (Arrhidaios) 323-319 BC, Price P66. Sorry for the lo-res photo. (I know there's a lot of controversy over when the facial features of Alexander first made it onto the coins, but this one looks particularly Alex-ish to me): [ATTACH=full]587231[/ATTACH] Denarius, T. Quinctius Flamininus, 126 BC (apex to l. on obverse; Macedonian shield below on rev.) [ATTACH=full]587232[/ATTACH] Toned siliquae aren't getting a lot of love in this thread, so... Valens, Arles ("Constantina"), 364-7. Scarce type & mint, it seems. RIC IX Arles 6d. [ATTACH=full]587237[/ATTACH] And going outside the classics: Shapur I (242-270), drachm: [ATTACH=full]587238[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Cabinet tone is not a priority for me, buuuuut....
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...