Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Paper Money
>
C.G.A in the news
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Niel, post: 743690, member: 13422"]I have to disagree in part. There are many possible scenarios where one buys a note basically sight unseen. Take for instance eBay or any online auction or brick and mortar auction where one mails or phones in a bid. You can make a coarse judgement about a note from photos and descriptions (remembering that both can be exaggerated, falsified and mis-represented thru omission or other means)</p><p>But no matter how good a photo is, nor how honest and critical a written description is, some things may not be apparent unless one can give the note an in hand first person examination.</p><p>This is where the value of a TPG comes in useful. Another set of (supposedly unbiased) critical eyes has looked at this note and made an assessment as to its condition. </p><p>We each become the final arbiter on the condition of any note we have, but it is handy to have a 'trusted source' who can help in the initial determination of whether to buy a note or not.</p><p><br /></p><p>The problem comes when a TPG that was trusted violates that trust. CGA didn't always overgrade or misrepresent notes. For some time they were *THE* TPG for notes. As such they were as respected and trusted as PMG and PCGS are today.</p><p>Somewhere along the line they changed their business practices and a lot of people have been hurt by following that trust...buyers and sellers alike.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Niel, post: 743690, member: 13422"]I have to disagree in part. There are many possible scenarios where one buys a note basically sight unseen. Take for instance eBay or any online auction or brick and mortar auction where one mails or phones in a bid. You can make a coarse judgement about a note from photos and descriptions (remembering that both can be exaggerated, falsified and mis-represented thru omission or other means) But no matter how good a photo is, nor how honest and critical a written description is, some things may not be apparent unless one can give the note an in hand first person examination. This is where the value of a TPG comes in useful. Another set of (supposedly unbiased) critical eyes has looked at this note and made an assessment as to its condition. We each become the final arbiter on the condition of any note we have, but it is handy to have a 'trusted source' who can help in the initial determination of whether to buy a note or not. The problem comes when a TPG that was trusted violates that trust. CGA didn't always overgrade or misrepresent notes. For some time they were *THE* TPG for notes. As such they were as respected and trusted as PMG and PCGS are today. Somewhere along the line they changed their business practices and a lot of people have been hurt by following that trust...buyers and sellers alike.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Paper Money
>
C.G.A in the news
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...