Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Byzantine: What changes with Leo III?
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Valentinian, post: 4799509, member: 44316"]Leo III's reign started in 717. The first emperor to put Christ on a coin was Justinian II who had two reigns, 685-695 with a gold solidus with the bust of Christ facing (and a similar silver piece), and 705-711 with another solidus with the bust of Christ facing in a completely different portrait (They certainly don't look at all like the same person. I have none to show.) Prior to Justinian II there were (poor) imperial portraits and tons of crosses and religious symbols, but no images of Christ, Mary, or saints. Looking at Sear's book I don't see pictures of Christ, Mary, or saints before Leo III other than those of Justinian II.</p><p><br /></p><p>Of course, by definition, iconoclasts did not want images of Christ. So, they did not appear on coins of Leo III. (Maybe he felt people worshipped money enough even without having the image of Christ on it!)</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1165546[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p>Leo III, 717- 741, with Constantine V from 720.</p><p>24 mm. 7.81 grams</p><p>His bust facing holding globus cruciger (a religious symbol)</p><p>Small bust of Constantine V over horizontal line with large M below,</p><p>ANN down its left, XX down its right (much is very weak)</p><p>dN CONSTANTINVS M</p><p>Sear 1514</p><p>DOC 3.1 Class 2, #29, "720-c.721"</p><p>Grierson 672. Berk 838.</p><p><br /></p><p>AE coins of Leo III are almost always poorly struck and in poor shape. This one is pretty good "for type."[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Valentinian, post: 4799509, member: 44316"]Leo III's reign started in 717. The first emperor to put Christ on a coin was Justinian II who had two reigns, 685-695 with a gold solidus with the bust of Christ facing (and a similar silver piece), and 705-711 with another solidus with the bust of Christ facing in a completely different portrait (They certainly don't look at all like the same person. I have none to show.) Prior to Justinian II there were (poor) imperial portraits and tons of crosses and religious symbols, but no images of Christ, Mary, or saints. Looking at Sear's book I don't see pictures of Christ, Mary, or saints before Leo III other than those of Justinian II. Of course, by definition, iconoclasts did not want images of Christ. So, they did not appear on coins of Leo III. (Maybe he felt people worshipped money enough even without having the image of Christ on it!) [ATTACH=full]1165546[/ATTACH] Leo III, 717- 741, with Constantine V from 720. 24 mm. 7.81 grams His bust facing holding globus cruciger (a religious symbol) Small bust of Constantine V over horizontal line with large M below, ANN down its left, XX down its right (much is very weak) dN CONSTANTINVS M Sear 1514 DOC 3.1 Class 2, #29, "720-c.721" Grierson 672. Berk 838. AE coins of Leo III are almost always poorly struck and in poor shape. This one is pretty good "for type."[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Byzantine: What changes with Leo III?
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...