Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Byzantine games for the truly bored
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="dougsmit, post: 2534012, member: 19463"]Among the great rarities of the 11th century Byzantine coppers are coins that were struck on metal that had not been used for coins previously. That provides us with many overstruck coins ranging from messy to really messy. I find interest in trying to figure out just how these coins came to be. Below are three Byzantine folles. On the left is Romanus IV's almost anonymous issue kept from that title by the large R on the reverse which stands for (guess?) Romanus. Research project: find a reference on these that doesn't assume you know the meanings of the other letters. On the right is a follis of Michael VII showing Christ facing on the obverse and the emperor on the reverse. I rotated the reverse to orient it like the detail on the middle coin which is what we got striking the right coin over the left coin. I should have rotated the obverse of the left coin to be oriented with the center coin but I could not find details that convinced me which way was up. </p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]541916[/ATTACH] </p><p>The interesting thing IMHO here is the weights and diameters of the coins. One reason for overstriking was to cut down on the metal used so it is no great surprise to me that the left coin "undertype" is heavier than the others. The surprise is that it is only a bit more than half the weight but 6mm greater in diameter. My guess here is that the host coin was trimmed down and hammered flat a bit more than usual making a flan so thin that it only retained a few of the details. We see part of the cross and a weak C (upper left quadrant). The C is larger than the one on the left coin but I see this as evidence that the coin was hammered (perhaps between leather???) to spread the flan for reuse. The more I look at coins like this, the more details I see that can be linked to the previous coin. This is the game for the truly bored I mentioned in the title. </p><p><br /></p><p>If you see something here you thing I saw incorrectly, please tell me. Both the right and the left coins show signs of having been, themselves, overstruck. On the left, is that a small Christ face peering over the top of the large Christ? Could it be SB1853? Identifying the history of these coins can be fun for those who like their coins 'Byzantine'.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="dougsmit, post: 2534012, member: 19463"]Among the great rarities of the 11th century Byzantine coppers are coins that were struck on metal that had not been used for coins previously. That provides us with many overstruck coins ranging from messy to really messy. I find interest in trying to figure out just how these coins came to be. Below are three Byzantine folles. On the left is Romanus IV's almost anonymous issue kept from that title by the large R on the reverse which stands for (guess?) Romanus. Research project: find a reference on these that doesn't assume you know the meanings of the other letters. On the right is a follis of Michael VII showing Christ facing on the obverse and the emperor on the reverse. I rotated the reverse to orient it like the detail on the middle coin which is what we got striking the right coin over the left coin. I should have rotated the obverse of the left coin to be oriented with the center coin but I could not find details that convinced me which way was up. [ATTACH=full]541916[/ATTACH] The interesting thing IMHO here is the weights and diameters of the coins. One reason for overstriking was to cut down on the metal used so it is no great surprise to me that the left coin "undertype" is heavier than the others. The surprise is that it is only a bit more than half the weight but 6mm greater in diameter. My guess here is that the host coin was trimmed down and hammered flat a bit more than usual making a flan so thin that it only retained a few of the details. We see part of the cross and a weak C (upper left quadrant). The C is larger than the one on the left coin but I see this as evidence that the coin was hammered (perhaps between leather???) to spread the flan for reuse. The more I look at coins like this, the more details I see that can be linked to the previous coin. This is the game for the truly bored I mentioned in the title. If you see something here you thing I saw incorrectly, please tell me. Both the right and the left coins show signs of having been, themselves, overstruck. On the left, is that a small Christ face peering over the top of the large Christ? Could it be SB1853? Identifying the history of these coins can be fun for those who like their coins 'Byzantine'.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Byzantine games for the truly bored
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...