Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Byzantine Empire: gold tremissis of Justinian I, ca. 527-565 AD
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="lordmarcovan, post: 3086183, member: 10461"]<font face="Georgia"><font size="5">There was an earlier (2016) <a href="https://www.cointalk.com/threads/ancient-byzantine-empire-gold-tremissis-of-justinian-i-ca-527-565-ad.286587/" class="internalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://www.cointalk.com/threads/ancient-byzantine-empire-gold-tremissis-of-justinian-i-ca-527-565-ad.286587/">thread</a> about this coin, but it was easier to create a new one than to retool the old one to my new format. (Eventually I will be linking to all these individual coin writeups from a master collection thread.)</font></font></p><p><font face="Georgia"><font size="5"><br /></font></font></p><p><font face="Georgia"><font size="5">The third-party certification result on this one was better than expected. CNG called the coin "<i>Good VF, slightly wavy flan, small edge split</i>".<a href="https://www.cngcoins.com/Coin.aspx?CoinID=226276#" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://www.cngcoins.com/Coin.aspx?CoinID=226276#" rel="nofollow">*</a> </font></font><font size="5"><font face="Georgia">NGC "promoted" it to Mint State with "<i>wrinkled</i>" notation, taking note of the excellent strike with a 5/5 rating.</font></font></p><p><font size="5"><font face="Georgia"><br /></font></font></p><p><font size="5"><font face="Georgia">From my point of view, the slight waviness to the flan is not at all objectionable.</font></font></p><p><font face="Georgia"><font size="5"><br /></font></font></p><p><font face="Georgia"><font size="5">Feel free to post your similar coins if you like.</font></font>[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="lordmarcovan, post: 3086183, member: 10461"][FONT=Georgia][SIZE=5]There was an earlier (2016) [URL='https://www.cointalk.com/threads/ancient-byzantine-empire-gold-tremissis-of-justinian-i-ca-527-565-ad.286587/']thread[/URL] about this coin, but it was easier to create a new one than to retool the old one to my new format. (Eventually I will be linking to all these individual coin writeups from a master collection thread.) The third-party certification result on this one was better than expected. CNG called the coin "[I]Good VF, slightly wavy flan, small edge split[/I]".[URL='https://www.cngcoins.com/Coin.aspx?CoinID=226276#']*[/URL] [/SIZE][/FONT][SIZE=5][FONT=Georgia]NGC "promoted" it to Mint State with "[I]wrinkled[/I]" notation, taking note of the excellent strike with a 5/5 rating. From my point of view, the slight waviness to the flan is not at all objectionable.[/FONT][/SIZE] [FONT=Georgia][SIZE=5] Feel free to post your similar coins if you like.[/SIZE][/FONT][/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Byzantine Empire: gold tremissis of Justinian I, ca. 527-565 AD
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...