Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Byzantine anonymous follis, Class A2
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="dougsmit, post: 3757500, member: 19463"]I agree with Black Friar's reason three. We rarely hold it against a seller when we buy a coin that looks better than his photo but we might hesitate to consign coins to a seller with poor photos. I can not accept statements about how a coin looks 'in hand'. If you don't like the way a coin looks 'in hand', move the hand somewhere with better light. Don't curse the darkness, turn on a light. </p><p><br /></p><p>Many/most of the examples here show that coins reflect glare as well as they do light. Often the difference between seeing glare or not is a very small wiggle of the hand. Photos with no glare tend not to look metallic while coins with too much are harsh. </p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>Quant. Geek showed an interesting difference. The lower photo shows excessive glare on the obverse upper left suggesting the coin was slightly bent or cupped. A slight tip of the coin would have changed this but for the better or just different would require trying it. The first image is too light but makes the coin look flatter. Each tells more about the light used for the photo than it does for the coin. That may be why some dealers are using movies to show high dollar coins that change in the light. Learn to read the images made by your favorite sellers and buy the coins you feel you will like based on experience.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="dougsmit, post: 3757500, member: 19463"]I agree with Black Friar's reason three. We rarely hold it against a seller when we buy a coin that looks better than his photo but we might hesitate to consign coins to a seller with poor photos. I can not accept statements about how a coin looks 'in hand'. If you don't like the way a coin looks 'in hand', move the hand somewhere with better light. Don't curse the darkness, turn on a light. Many/most of the examples here show that coins reflect glare as well as they do light. Often the difference between seeing glare or not is a very small wiggle of the hand. Photos with no glare tend not to look metallic while coins with too much are harsh. Quant. Geek showed an interesting difference. The lower photo shows excessive glare on the obverse upper left suggesting the coin was slightly bent or cupped. A slight tip of the coin would have changed this but for the better or just different would require trying it. The first image is too light but makes the coin look flatter. Each tells more about the light used for the photo than it does for the coin. That may be why some dealers are using movies to show high dollar coins that change in the light. Learn to read the images made by your favorite sellers and buy the coins you feel you will like based on experience.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Byzantine anonymous follis, Class A2
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...