Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Numismania, post: 1254795, member: 28971&quot;]I think this statement is as close as you can get, but back it up to 2004, cut it at 2009.&nbsp; These specific dates...2004-2008 Roosies are tough in high grade (only going by PCGS pops...don&#039;t know about NGC).&nbsp; However, those that THINK 2009 dated Roosies are &#039;winneres&#039;, no offense intended, are wrong.&nbsp; According to pops, 2004 was the last year of 100+ coins graded in MS67FB until 2009, with 222 2009-P being graded (MS67FB being highest), and 161 2009-D being graded (MS68FB being highest graded).&nbsp; I, myself, bought a couple of rolls of &#039;09-P &amp; D nickels and dimes (in mid &#039;09) for approx $10 each, just to see what might happen with them.&nbsp; I sold them on ebay for almost $30 each early/mid 2010.&nbsp; No way you could get half that much now.&nbsp; I would NEVER pay much more than face for a roll of &#039;09&#039;s (P or D).&nbsp; If you can get them at face, you might make out a LITTLE bit (in box quantity), but there is nothing about the &#039;09&#039;s that make them &#039;rare&#039; or &#039;winners&#039;.&nbsp; I believe the only real clad &#039;winners&#039; (NOT rare...except in the highest grade) are the &#039;82 and &#039;83&#039;s (not including errors, varieties)...and we all know why those are the real &#039;winners&#039; of clad coinage.&nbsp; </p><p><br /></p><p>IF someone can find enough unknowledgable collectors to spend crazy $$ on &#039;09&#039;s, more power to you...sell all you can now.&nbsp; They will NOT be rare.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in